Moshe at a Loss for
Words?
R. Yaakov
Bieler
Parshat Korach,
5765
In Parshat Korach we encounter an
intriguing radical departure from the standard pattern of
behavior that Jewish biblical leaders up until this point have
regularly undertaken. The rebels who challenged the legitimacy of
Aharon’s position as “Kohen Gadol” (High Priest), die supernaturally, attesting
to the unjustness of their cause, just as Moshe had predicted.[1]
The fire pans with which some of Korach’s now-deceased followers offered
incense, have been incorporated into the outer altar to permanently commemorate
the incident.[2]
One would expect that these very
visible manifestations of HaShem’s Displeasure with the dissidents should
result in totally quashing complaints and grumblings among the Jewish people, at
least for a short time. However, not even a day goes by before Moshe and Aharon
are once again subject to harsh accusations and even an implied physical
threat.
BaMidbar
17:6-8
And the next day, “Kol”
(all) of the congregation of Israel complained about Moshe and Aharon
saying, “You have killed the people of HaShem.”
And it came to pass when the
congregation had gathered in order to confront Moshe and Aharon, they turned to
the Tent of Meeting, and behold the Cloud had covered it,[3]
and there appeared the Glory of HaShem.
And Moshe and Aharon came to the
front of the Tent of Meeting.
At this point, as had happened on
so many previous occasions,[4]
HaShem Indicates to the leaders of the Jewish people that He is Preparing to
destroy the people because of their continued obstinacy and bad acts.
However, whereas in the past, the Avraham and Moshe proceed to make
impassioned pleas on behalf of the threatened multitudes once
informed by HaShem of what He Intends,[5]
in this case, no such prayers or supplications are
forthcoming on the parts of Moshe and Aharon.
BaMidbar
17:9-10
And God Spoke to Moshe
saying:
Rise up from the midst of this
congregation, and I will Consume them in an instant. And they (Moshe and Aharon)
fell upon their faces.
This time, instead of rising to
the threatened people’s defense, Moshe appears to accept the inevitability of a
devastating plague killing at least some of the Jewish people, and at best,
hopes to stop it at a relatively early point by instructing Aharon to engage in
a type of sacrifice, ironically the same sacrifice which led to the deaths of
the 250 allies of Korach, whom Moshe is being accused of murdering.
BaMidbar
17:11
And Moshe said to Aharon: “Take
the fire pan and place upon it a glowing coal from upon the altar, and place
incense and walk quickly among the congregation and atone on their behalves,
because Anger has gone out from before HaShem and the plague has begun.
If we assume that Moshe’s
personality was such that he naturally was drawn to intervene when someone was
in trouble, as illustrated early on in his life while still in Egypt and then in
Midyan,[6]
we could wonder what sort of fundamental change does he undergo that causes him
to no longer be ready to defend those threatened by danger.
The question appears to be
deepened further when we recognize that on the day before the
incident recorded in 17:6 ff. Moshe and Aharon had powerfully
responded to a Divine Threat against the people as a whole[6A]
with a cogent defense:
BaMidbar
16:20-22
And HaShem spoke to Moshe and
Aharon, saying:
Separate from the midst of this
congregation and I will Consume them in an instant!
And they (Moshe and Aharon) fell
on their faces, and they said: HaShem, the God of all of the souls in all
flesh, one person sins and You will Unleash Your Anger against the entire
congregation?
What happens between yesterday and
today that causes Moshe to be transformed from a proactive
advocate into a relatively[6B]
passive bystander?
The specific instance recorded in
BaMidbar 17 is not only difficult from the perspective of what takes place in
BaMidbar 16, but also because it is HaShem Himself Who deliberately
Trains both Avraham and Moshe to debate with Him in every
such circumstance, when masses of people are threatened by Divine Destruction.
With respect to Avraham,
the Tora quotes HaShem as reflectively justifying notifying His Prophet of what
is intended for Sodom and Amora before He Discloses the
Divine Plan to him.
Beraishit
18:17-19
And HaShem Said:[7]
Can/Should I Conceal from Avraham that which I am Doing?
And Avraham is destined to be a
great and mighty nation and all of the nations of the earth will use him as a
model for blessing.
Because I Know him, that he is
committed to commanding his offspring and his household who come after him, and
they will observe the Way of HaShem to do righteousness and justice, in order
that HaShem will Bring to Avraham that of which He Spoke to him.[8]
HaShem’s Question would appear to
be rhetorical—of course HaShem could and usually does Keep Avraham, and anyone
else for that matter, “in the dark” about any Divine Plan.[9]
It would appear that far more is not known about how HaShem
Conducts the affairs of the world, than is known, as expressed in
Devarim 29:28, “The hidden things are to HaShem our God, while the
obvious/revealed things are to ourselves and our offspring forever in order to
carry out all of the words of this Tora.” Consequently, when HaShem deliberately
Chooses to inform someone of what is planned, particularly when it is
destructive in nature, it would seem logical that He is Doing so in order to
elicit a response of a plea for mercy.
In Moshe’s case, not only do the
Rabbis understand that HaShem encourages him to dispute a decree of wholesale
death, but that he is even given a specific text of the argument to be used in
defense of the people. Following the sin of the Golden Calf, HaShem Says to
Moshe:
Shemot
32:10
And now leave Me alone and
I will Vent My Anger upon them and I will Consume them and I will Make you into
a great nation.
RaShI
We still have not heard that Moshe
prayed on their behalf (that it should be necessary for HaShem to Tell him to
stop—see Devarim 3:23-26 for an example where HaShem
responds to Moshe’s prayer on his own behalf, and Tells him to stop praying),
and He Says, “Leave me alone”? But rather here He Opened for him (Moshe) an
opening and Made known to him that the matter depended upon him, i.e., that
if he prayed on their behalves, He would not Destroy them.
Shemot
33:19
And He Said: I will Cause to pass
before you (Moshe) all of My Goodness, and I will Call out in the Name of HaShem
before you, and I will be Gracious to whomever I will be Gracious, and I will be
Merciful to whomever I will be Merciful.”
RaShI
The moment has arrived when you
will see My Glory to the extent that I will Allow you to see, because I Wish to
and Must Teach you the order of prayer. When you requested mercy on behalf of
the Jewish people, you mentioned the merits of the Forefathers (Shemot 32:13).
This implies that you believe that should the merits of the Forefathers be
exhausted, there will cease to be any hope. Therefore I will Cause to pass all
of the attributes of My Goodness before you (Shemot 34:6-7) on the boulder, and
you will be hidden in the cave. And I will Call upon the Name of HaShem before
you. This is in order to teach you the manner in which you will request mercy
even when the merits of the
Forefathers are used up. And in the manner that you see Me enveloped and
reciting the 13 Divine Attributes, teach the Jewish people to do the same.
Only a few chapters prior to
Parshat Korach, Moshe precisely follows the “script” that HaShem provides for
him in Shemot, when confronted with HaShem’s Anger in response to the sin of the
spies. Rather than mentioning the promises that had been made to Avraham,
Yitzchak and Yaakov, i.e., “the merits of the Forefathers”, as he had following
the sin of the Golden Calf (Shemot 32:13), Moshe substitutes the 13 Divine
Attributes, as per HaShem’s Instructions.
BaMidbar
14:17-18
And now, let the Power of HaShem
be increased as You have Spoken, Saying: “HaShem, Slow to anger and Possessing
great kindness, Who Forgives inadvertent and deliberate transgressions, and
Declares innocence; but does not always Declare innocence. Who Visits the sins
of the fathers upon the children, grandchildren and great grandchildren.”
(Compare these verses with Shemot 34:6-7).
And in Parshat Korach itself, one
commentator understands how HaShem once again is strongly hinting to Moshe that
he must attempt to oppose the destruction of the Jewish people that He has just
Threatened.
BaMidbar
16:20-21
And HaShem spoke to Moshe and
Aharon, saying:
Separate from the midst of this
congregation and I will Consume them in an instant!
Alshich[9A]
In order that Moshe and Aharon
would not be swept up in the punishment to be meted out to Korach and his
followers, it was unnecessary for them to physically separate from them, just as
it was unnecessary for the sons of Korach to separate in order that they would
not die.[9B]
But rather (by means of this
Command), the Holy One, blessed be He, Desired that Moshe and Aharon would ask
for mercy on behalf of the entire congregation so that they would not be
destroyed. It is for this reason that He Said, “Separate from the midst of this
congregation and I will Consume them in an instant!” so that Moshe and Aharon
would say to themselves: Is it so that we will not be swept up in the punishment
to be meted out to Korach and his followers that He has Said this to us? That is
impossible! And furthermore, why is He Informing us that He Intends to destroy
them? (See the discussion above regarding Beraishit 18:17-19.) The only reason
must be so that we will ask for mercy for them, i.e., if one person sins, that
should not result in Divine Wrath being directed at the entire congregation.
Consequently, “They fell on their faces”.
According to this approach,
emphasizing how HaShem expects a Jewish leader to little more than invoke a
spiritual formula in order to win a reprieve for the people, Moshe did not have
to necessarily be personally invested in standing up in defense of the people at
this point, as long as he just said/”davened” the “right thing”. So why didn’t he
in BaMidbar 17:11?
One commentator who wonders about
Moshe’s failure to pray is the Ba’al HaTurim. He invokes a passage from
the Talmud in order to suggest a means by which what takes place can be
understood.
“…And they fell on their
faces.”
And they (Moshe and Aharon) did
not pray as before, because the prayer was not “Shegura” (flowing,
comfortable) in their mouths. It is for this reason that it is said,
(17:11) “…For ‘Ketzef’ (wrath) has gone
out from the Lord…”, as R. Chanina ben Dosa said, (Berachot 34b) when he would pray for the ill, “If my prayer did not
flow from my mouth, I know that the prayer has not been accepted.”[10]
Ba’al HaTurim’s comparison of
Moshe to R. Chanina ben Dosa with regard to prayer could be understood as
attributing to Moshe extreme spiritual powers, an assumption that is not
unreasonable considering Moshe’s unique relationship with HaShem throughout his
life.[11]
Just as the Talmud is replete with stories about R. Chanina ben Dosa’s
exceptional holiness,[12]
particularly when it comes to prayer,[13]
Moshe too helps through prayer to eventually cure his sister Miriam when she is
stricken with the metaphysical illness of Tzora’at.[14]
However, it is also possible to
consider Ba’al HaTurim’s insight that Moshe simply could not get the words out
fast enough, independent of the comparison with R. Chanina ben Dosa, i.e., Moshe
was unable to enunciate a prayer, not due to the hopelessness of Bnai Yisrael’s
spiritual state and HaShem’s Unwillingness to spare them this time from the
adverse effects of the Divine Plague, as He had Done in the past, but rather
because of some sort of deep reservation on Moshe’s part against intervening
on the people’s behalf. While Moshe’s incapability to find words quickly
enough in order to head off the plague via prayer could have been the result of
fatigue, stress or emotional upheaval, there is also the possibility that his
inability to defend them had a “Freudian” basis. Could it have been that
Moshe simply no longer felt the same about the Jewish people to the extent that
he could advocate for them unreservedly and with passion, even if all that was
required was some sort of formulaic recitation? Could a line have been crossed
by the Jews during the course of their most recent transgressions whereby
whatever it had taken for Moshe to confront HaShem after the sin of the spies
and argue for the forgiving of the people, was no longer available to him? Did
the outward symptom of his ambivalence over what to do immediately, represent
inner doubt or even turmoil with respect to his relationship with his fellow
Jews?
Here is a listing of the various
accusations that the Jewish people brought to bear against Moshe during the
period of Moshe’s leadership, contained in the books of Shemot and BaMidbar,
along with Moshe’s responses:
a. Shemot 5:21 “…You have spoiled our
reputations in the eyes of Pharoah
and placed a sword in their (the
Egyptians’) hands to kill us.”
5:22 “…Why have You Done evil with
this people? Why have You Sent me? From the time that You have Sent me to
Pharoah to speak in Your Name, evil has befallen this people and You surely have
not Saved them.”
b. Shemot 14:11-12 “…Were there
insufficient graves in Egypt that you took us out in order to
die in the desert? What have you done to us to take us out of
Egypt? This is exactly what I said to
you in Egypt, ‘Leave us alone so that we can
serve the Egyptians’, since it is better for us to serve the Egyptians than to
die in the desert.”
14:15 (Since HaShem Says to Moshe,
“…Why are you screaming/praying to Me…” it is implied that some prayer was being
offered, although we are not made privy to the words of this
prayer.)
c. Shemot 15:24 “…What can we
drink?”
15:25 “And he cried out/prayed to
HaShem…” (Once again we read that Moshe prayed without
being told exactly what he said.)
d. Shemot 16:3 “…If only HaShem
had Caused us to die in Egypt while we were sitting upon the
fleshpots, when we ate bread to the point of satiation. For you took us into
this desert to kill this entire congregation by means of
famine.”
(There is no indication
of a prayer on Moshe’s part this time; only HaShem’s informing the Jewish
leadership of what He Intends to do in order that food will be provided to the
people.)
e. Shemot 17:2-3 “…Give us
water so that we can drink…Why did you take us out of
Egypt? To kill me, my children and my
herds by thirst?”
17:4 “And Moshe
cried out to HaShem, ‘What can I do for/with(?) this people? In a short time
they will stone me.’” (This would appear to be less of a prayer on behalf of the
people, as much as a prayer on behalf of Moshe himself.)
f. BaMidbar 14:2 “…If only we
had died either in Egypt or in this desert. If only we had
died. Why did HaShem Bring us to this desert in order to die? Our wives and
children will be disparaged. It would be better for us to return to
Egypt. (14:10 attributes to the people the
intention to stone Moshe and Aharon, out of their fears and frustration arising
from the report of the spies.)
14:5 (No
specific prayer is mentioned, but the fact that Moshe and Aharon “fall on their
faces before the entire congregation of the Children of Israel” suggests that
some sort of supplication was taking place. However, by defining the object of
the “falling on the face” as the people rather than HaShem, it is possible that
the action was directed at them, imploring them to reconsider their negative
attitudes, as opposed to a prayer to HaShem. Of course, it must be noted that
eventually, when HaShem Tells Moshe in BaMidbar 13:11-12 that He Intends to
destroy the people in its entirety, Moshe rises eloquently to their
defense in 13:13 ff.)
g. BaMidbar 16:3 “…You have too
much. This entire congregation, it is all holy and HaShem is in its midst. Why
have you exalted yourselves above the congregation of HaShem?”
16:4 Moshe falls on his face,
suggesting a prayer to HaShem, but without specific words.
h. BaMidbar 16:13-14 “…Is it a small
thing that you have caused us to go up out of a land flowing with milk and honey
in order to kill us in the desert? And you wish to rule over us as well? And you
haven’t even brought us to a land flowing with milk and honey nor have you
caused us to inherit a land of fields and vineyards…” (Although these are the
specific words of Datan and Aviram, as opposed to the words attributed to the
entire congregation, as in 16:3 above, nevertheless it is highly likely that
these sentiments were shared by a wide number of individuals, if not the
masses.)
16:15 “And
Moshe was exceedingly angry.
And he said to HaShem, “Do not Accept their sacrifice…” (Not only is this not a
prayer in defense of the people, but it is a specific call for Divine Vengeance
and Retribution against the obstinate stance of at least a segment of the
people.)
i. BaMidbar 17:6 “…You have killed
the people of HaShem.”[15]
One approach for understanding
this apparent inconsistency on Moshe’s part, would be to suggest that in light
of Moshe and Aharon’s having defended the people on the previous day (16:20-22),
and all the thanks that they get is further recriminations (17:6), Moshe arrives
at the conclusion that at least this time, there is no point in further
challenging HaShem’s Decree. The Jews have demonstrated by their ongoing
recalcitrance that they will only learn “the hard way” to correct their outlook
and behavior. In all other instances of complaints followed by defense, a
significant amount of time elapses and Moshe could therefore rationalize that
the newly-freed slaves are fickle and therefore require intercessions again and
again to try to reform them into the type of nation that HaShem Intends. But
when yesterday’s lesson is lost on today’s behavior, could Moshe hav simply
stepped back and allowed events to take their Divinely-Intended
course?
An alternate approach would focus
attention not upon the fact that the Jews complained, but rather what it was
that they specifically said. While the people had previously stated in various
forms that the Exodus from Egypt orchestrated by Moshe was going to
result in the deaths of the Jews in general, they had never before accused
him of being responsible for actually killing a particular group of
individuals, let alone leaders of the tribes (BaMidbar 16:2). The initial
culture shock of going from Egypt into the desert could account for
many of the earlier complaints that Moshe managed to avoid taking personally.
But when the later attacks become exceedingly personal, they appear to unduly
disconcert and frustrate him. Furthermore, it is one thing to be suspected of
nepotism in terms of elevating to positions of status and authority one’s family
and friends; it is entirely another matter when you are accused of craftily
murdering those who may be competing with you for positions of leadership.
Although having Aharon use the same incense that caused the deaths of the 250 to
cause the plague to cease, allows the people to recognize Aharon’s
appropriateness for the job of Kohen Gadol, as well as the benevolent side of
the incense offering, Moshe may have had trouble advocating on behalf of the
Jewish people after having his moral integrity so roundly attacked.[15A]
While nothing excuses people from
unfairly and insensitively impugning their leaders’ virtues and values, being
able to absorb such barbs and criticisms “goes with the territory” of leading
others. There are going to be unpleasant moments, and the degree to which those
making the attacks can eventually be conciliatory and those who bear the brunt
of the negative false comments can bounce back and put the regrettable events
behind them, will determine whether an organization or community can “move on”
or become inured in recriminations, negativity and bad feeling. One can only
feel deep compassion for someone who clearly sacrificed so much, only to be
finally treated so disrespectfully. Moshe’s failure to pray after being accused
of murder may constitute a relatively subtle insight into the text, but one that
is of great significance for all of us involved in interactions with others,
whether on the leadership or constituent level.
Shabbat Shalom, and let us hope
that peace will reign in our homes, our communities, our country and in the
world.
[1] a) BaMidbar 16:16-30 Moshe sets the
stage for the manner of Divine Punishment to be meted out to the rebels. b) 16:31-33 Korach, his
chief followers and their families are swallowed up by the earth. c) 16:35 the
250 men who offered up incense in a quest for higher positions as Kohanim are
consumed by fire.
[2] 17:1-5. It is curious that the
implements of individuals who challenged Moshe’s authority, which in effect
constituted also challenging HaShem’s Authority—if Korach and his followers
believed that Moshe was carrying out HaShem’s Will, they would never have
mounted their challenge—should become a permanent part of one of the holiest
aspects of the Mishkan, i.e., the outer altar upon which all animal, grain and
wine sacrifices were offered. RaMBaN suggests that while the intent of the
rebels was not pure, since they nevertheless precisely carried out Moshe’s
orders in BaMidbar 16:16-17, the vessels became as sanctified as any used by
Kohanim within legitimate contexts. However, it would seem to me that a more
subtle and interesting religious dimension is being reflected in the
incorporation of the fire pans into the altar. Although the Mishna in Avot 5:17
categorizes the dispute engaged in by Korach and his followers as a disagreement
that was not “LeSheim Shamayim” (for the sake of Heaven, i.e., ulterior rather
than idealistic and spiritual motives underlay the conflict), perhaps a
distinction can be drawn between Korach, Datan, Aviram and Ohn ben Peles (16:1)
[see http://www.kmsynagogue.org/Korach.html
for an extensive discussion of the fate of Ohn ben Peles] on the one hand, and
the rest of the rebels (16:2) on the other. While it does appear from 16:3, 5
that the entire group challenges Moshe and therefore should be categorized as
equally culpable, the fact that Moshe specifically addresses only Korach (16:8)
and Datan and Aviram (16:12) may suggest that there was a
difference in intent between the leadership and the mass of followers. If the
250 dissidents honestly believed that what they were doing was in the interests
of establishing the truth, as misguided as they may have ended up being, could
they nevertheless be given credit for acting “LeSheim Shamayim”? Whereas the
concept of “Aveira LeShmah” (a transgression for the sake of HaShem) usually is
treated as a virtuous act, assuming that the perpetrator is completely above
reproach, as in the cases of Yael (Shoftim 4:17-22; 5:24; Horiyot 10b) and
Esther (Sanhedrin 74b), can there be a middle category as well, i.e., where the
transgressors are held accountable for their sins, but their positive religious
intent is acknowledged, in this case by taking the implements that they used and
creating a permanent monument from them as part of the Mishkan? This line of
thought would align the 250 followers of Korach with Nadav and Avihu, who while
also consumed by a Divine Fire, are described as HaShem’s “Holy Ones”—(VaYikra
10:3 “…This is what HaShem Meant when He Said, ‘By those who are close to Me
will I be Sanctified, and in front of the entire nation will I be
Revered’…”
[3] For a discussion of the
significance of Divine Clouds during the journeys of the Jewish people in the
desert, see http://www.kmsynagogue.org/Behaalotcha.html
[4] See for example, Beraishit
18:17ff.; Shemot 32:7 ff.; BaMidbar 14:11 ff.
[5] The reason given for why Noach is
not to be considered in the same category with the likes of Avraham and Moshe,
is because upon being told that HaShem’s Intention was to destroy the entire
world with the exception of Noach’s immediate family, Noach accepted this decree
and voiced no protest. In the words of “Beit Elokim”, Sha’ar HaTefilla, Chapt.
12: “…It seems that the leaders of the generation are obligated to pray for the
welfare of their contemporaries. Since the ‘Tzaddik’ (righteous individual) is
the foundation of the universe, it is appropriate for him to pray that the
inhabitants of the universe continue to exist, that they have the merit to live
during his lifetime. This is a major responsibility for ‘Tzaddikim’, as we see
in the case of Noach, where the flood is directly associated with him (Yeshayahu
54:9 “Because this is to Me the ‘Flood of Noach’ since I Swore that I
would not Bring a ‘Flood of Noach’ again onto the earth so too I Swore
not to be wrath with you and to be angry with you”) because he did not pray on
their behalf. (The implication is, that had Noach prayed, perhaps the
flood could have been avoided. If that is the case, then his lack of prayer
could indirectly be blamed for the coming of the flood. However, the simple
meaning of the verse in Yeshayahu is that since the flood took place during
Noach’s lifetime and he was the key survivor from it, it is associated with him,
not because it was in any way his fault, but rather merely because it was
contemporaneous with him. The “Ba’alei Mussar” [those that seek to provide moral
direction to the Jewish people] have chosen to give the phrase a more
homiletical meaning.)
A similar point can be made with
regard to the story of Yona. While initially, Yona did all that he could in
order not to be sent to Ninveh and deliver a warning of impending doom,
eventually he accepts his fate and carries out his mission. While his reticence
to go in the first place could be interpreted as a desire to prevent the
catastrophe from occurring—if the people are not warned, they cannot be
justifiably punished, as determined by the rule, “One cannot punish unless one
first warns”—Sanhedrin 56b, the more traditional Rabbinic view contends that
Yona was afraid that the non-Jewish inhabitants of Ninveh would repent, and
their acceptance of God’s Will would create an unfavorable contrast with the
Jews who continued to be recalcitrant. What does not appear in the story is any
attempt on Yona’s part to try to talk HaShem out of destroying the Ninvites
altogether.
[6] See Shemot 2:11-12, 13-14, 17.
[6A]
Moshe and Aharon’s defense,
(6:22) “…One person (Korach) sins and
You will Unleash Your Anger against the entire congregation?” was clearly not
intended to protect the rebels themselves.
[6B]
Moshe does direct Aharon to take
incense and stand in the midst of the people in order to quell the plague.
However by this time 14,700 had already died
(17:11-15).
[7] The Tora does not identify a
listener for HaShem’s Comments, implying that this is an “inner” thought of
which the reader is being made aware.
[8] This would appear to be a reference
to the promises made by HaShem to Avraham in the “Covenant between the
Pieces”—Beraishit 15:13-21.
[9] Contrary to common belief, a Jewish
prophet does not know comprehensively everything that will happen in the future,
but rather only that which HaShem Allows him to know. Consequently, e.g., Moshe
is unaware of the outcome of sending the spies before they return with their
report, even though the language at the beginning of Parshat Shelach suggests
that HaShem Authorizes the mission (BaMidbar 13:1), just as he is unaware of the
consequences of his striking the rock in order to extract water in BaMidbar 20:1
ff. Therefore, had HaShem Chosen not to tell Avraham about the mission of the
two angels that had visited him, Avraham would have found out only after the
fact. Telling him beforehand could have had only one intent—to get Avraham to
respond and defend the Sodomites.
[9A]
Quoted in Nechama Leibowitz,
Gilyanot LeIyun BeParshat HaShavua, 5720, Section 3.
[9B]
See BaMidbar
26:10-11.
[10] Yad Yosef, a commentary in Ein
Yaakov on Berachot 34b, quotes MaHaRaM Shiff to the effect that a support for R.
Chanina ben Dosa’s idea can be derived from Shir HaShirim 4:3—“Your lips are
like a thread of scarlet…”Just like the red thread (that hung from various parts
of the Tabernacle/Temple—see Rosh HaShana 31b) would turn white on Yom
HaKippurim once the scapegoat was thrown from the mountain (as an indication of
the sins of the Jewish people being forgiven by HaShem), and thereby reveal that
which would be Decreed from Above regarding the atonement for one’s sins, so too
your lips, i.e., the lips make known in terms of whether the prayer
flows…
[11] In BaMidbar 12:8 HaShem Himself
describes Moshe’s lofty spiritual status.
[12] See e.g., Shabbat 112b (R.Ch.b.D.’s
donkey); Ta’anit 25a (R.Ch.b.D.’s goats); Yevamot 121b (R.Ch.b.D.’s powers
regarding knowing the status of an individual in
danger).
[13] See e.g., Berachot 34b (R.Ch.b.D.’s
successful praying for a cure for R. Yochanan ben Zakai’s ill child) and Yoma
53b (R.Ch.b.D.’s prayers controlling rain).
[14] BaMidbar 12:13. Although Miriam is
not immediately cured, as reflected in HaShem’s Explanation to Moshe in 12:14,
nevertheless, it is possible that had Moshe not prayer on her behalf, her malady
would have lasted that much longer, if not
indefinitely.
[15] Several commentators explain the
people’s attack on Moshe with respect to the deaths of the 250 followers of
Korach as based upon the perception that had a different sacrifice been chosen
as the determinant of who was HaShem’s Chosen Leader, those who were not chosen
would not have necessarily died; however, due to the exceptionally holy nature
of the incense offering, unauthorized sacrifices would inevitably result in the
deaths of those attempting to offer them. Of course, Moshe had nothing to do
with the nature of the trial since it was HaShem Who not only Chose Aharon to
serve as High Priest, but also how this was to be publicly demonstrated, and
therefore bears no responsibility in any
way.
[15A]
Alan Mansfield suggests that
perhaps this is the intention of the usage of the verb “Heiromu” (cause
yourselves to rise up/above) in 17:10, i.e., HaShem is Commanding Moshe
and Aharon to resist allowing the personal attacks to “get to them”.
Unfortunately human nature is such that this is easier said than done.