Parents and
Teachers as Quasi-Kohanim?
R. Yaakov
Bieler
Parashat Naso,
5766
The Biblical
blessing appearing in Parshat Naso, that the Kohanim are commanded to bestow
upon the Jewish people—
BaMidbar 6:23-26
May God Bless you and Keep
you.
May God Cause His Face to shine
upon you and Be Gracious to you.
May God Lift His Face towards you
and Give you peace.
—is typically more well-known than
most other portions of the Tora not only because of its regular invocation
during morning prayer services, but also due to the custom of parents blessing
their children at the advent of each Shabbat (e.g., ArtScroll Siddur, pp.
354-5), as well as upon the occasion of their wedding (e.g., The RCA Lifecycle
Madrich, pp. 86-7).[1]
However the assumption that the
blessings appearing in these verses can be freely used by parents, or anyone
else for that matter, outside the context of the ritual services in first the
Tabernacle, and then the Temples that were intended specifically and exclusively
to be led by the Kohanim, and now commemorated during the repetition of the
morning prayer services,[2]
appears to be belied by BaMidbar 6:22-23 and its Rabbinic
commentary.
And God Spoke to Moses,
Saying:
Speak to Aharon and his sons,
saying: “Koh” (in this particular manner, i.e., in these specific
words) “Tevarchu” (you will bless) the Children of Israel, say to
them…
Ketubot
24b
…In the case of “Nesiat Kapayim”
(lit. lifting up the hands, i.e., the act of blessing the people by the Priests
that entails their extending their hands before them while pronouncing the
Priestly Blessings, implied in VaYikra 9:22 “And Aharon lifted up his hands to
the people and he blessed them…”)[3]
if one who is not a Kohen performs the pronouncing of the “Birkat Kohanim”,
he is transgressing the prohibition of a positive commandment…(i.e.,
although the Tora never explicitly states in the form of a negative injunction
that a non-Priest must not invoke these blessings, there is a clear implication
from the converse that if it is the Priests who ought to bless the Jewish people
in this particular manner, others are precluded from doing so—see RaShI’s
commentary on this passage.)[4]
The following anecdote, related by
R. Baruch Halevi Epstein, author of the well-known Bible commentary “Tora
Temima”, (Numbers 6:23, #131; Tosefet Beracha, Bamidbar, p. 30) illustrates how
at least one illustrious Rabbinic figure took pains to avoid bestowing the
“Birchat Kohanim” in a manner identical to how they were invoked during
I heard from a trustworthy man in
Vilna, who in turn heard from his elderly father, my father-in-law, the Gaon, R.
Yechezkel Landau, head of the Vilna Rabbinic Court (who died in 5631 [1871] at
the age of 91), that on the day of his wedding, the Gaon of Vilna blessed him,
and placed a single hand upon his head at the time of the blessing. Since it was well-known that all of his
(the Vilna Gaon’s) actions and behaviors were performed in strict accordance
with Jewish law, some who were close to him asked him why he did so, i.e., place
only one hand upon the individual being blessed. The Vilna Gaon responded, “We
only find a blessing given with two hands when the Kohanim bestowed blessings in
the
While one could make similar
technical adjustments to the manner in which the Blessings are given, following
the lead of the Vilna Gaon, that would ostensibly allow non-Kohanim to impart the Priestly
Blessings upon others—the Tora prohibition could be narrowly understood to apply
only to someone who is intrinsically disqualified from participating in the
Temple rituals were there a Temple today,[5]
going up before the congregation during a synagogue service at the point of
“Nesiat Kapayim” and acting as if he were a Kohen; consequently as long as the
Blessing in question is given in some sort of informal context and in a manner
formalistically distinct from what was done during the Temple period, no
infraction has occurred—nevertheless it is interesting to consider why a
non-Kohen would be interested in using these particular Blessings in the first
place. What is their attraction, and why would someone as punctilious as the
Vilna Gaon have relied upon what amounts to essentially a legal loophole in
order to be able invoke these specific blessings?
With respect to the choice of
“Birchat Kohanim” as the natural Biblical blessing to be used when parents
desire to bless their progeny,[6]
potential alternate blessings that were given by parents to their children[7]
are recorded in Sefer Beraishit, and one might initially think that at least one
of them could serve as a preferable alternative to the verses in BaMidbar in
light of the Gemora in Ketubot listed above:
a) Noach
Beraishit
9:26-7
And he said: Blessed be HaShem,
the God of Shem, and let
God Shall Enlarge Yafet and he
will dwell in the tents of Shem. And let
b) Lavan along with the rest of Rivka’s
family
Beraishit
24:60
…Our sister, be the mother of
thousands of ten thousands, and let your offspring possess the gate of those
that hate them.
c) Yitzchak to Yaakov pretending to be
Eisav
Beraishit
27:27-9
…See the smell of my son is like
the smell of a field which HaShem has Blessed.
God will Give you of the dew of
Heaven and from the fat places upon the earth, and plenty of corn and
wine.
Let peoples serve you and nations
bow down to you. Be lord over your brothers, and let your mother’s sons bow down
to you.
Cursed is everyone who curses you,
and blessed be everyone who blesses you.
d) Yitzchak to
Eisav
Beraishit
27:39-40
…Behold, of the fat places of the
earth shall be your dwelling, and of the dew from Heaven above.
And by your sword shall you live
and you shall serve your brother. And it will come to pass, when you shall break
loose, and you will shake his yoke from upon your neck.
e) Yitzchak to Yaakov being
himself
Beraishit
28:3-4
And God Almighty Bless you and
Make you fruitful and multiply you that you may be a congregation of peoples.
And Give you the blessing of
Avraham, to you and to your descendents, that you may inherit the land of your
sojourning, which God Gave to Avraham.
f) Lavan to his daughters and
grandchildren
Beraishit
32:1
And Lavan rose early in the
morning and he kissed his (grand)sons and daughters and he blessed
them…
g) Yaakov to Yosef via Ephraim and
Menashe
Beraishit
48:14-20
And Yisrael put forth his right
hand and placed it on the head of Ephraim, who was the youngest, and his left
hand on Menashe’s head; he reversed his hands because Menashe was the
first-born.
And he blessed Yosef and he said:
The God before Whom my fathers walked,
Avraham and Yitzchak; the God Who has Shepherded me from my formative
years until today.
And the angel who has redeemed me
from evil, he will bless the boys and cause my name, as well as the names of my
fathers Avraham and Yitzchak to be called upon them, and they will be
plentifully fruitful in the midst of the land.
And Yosef saw that he had placed
his right hand on the head of Ephraim, and it was bad in his eyes, and he took
hold of his father’s hand in order to remove it from the head of Ephraim onto
the head of Menashe.
And Yosef said to his father: Not
so, my father for this is the first-born. Put your hand on his
head.
And his father refused and said, I
know, my son, I know. He too will become a nation and he will grow; nevertheless
his younger brother will become greater than he, and his offspring shall become
a multitude of nations.
And he blessed them on that day
saying: This is the manner in which
h) Yaakov to all of his sons
Beraishit
49:3-28
(The summarizing verse following
the individual pronouncements to each of Yaakov’s sons): …And this is it that
their father spoke to them and blessed them, everyone according to his blessing
he blessed them.[8]
But upon further reflection, we
come to see that the overwhelming majority of these other blessings cannot be
appropriated by the generic parent speaking to his child. In the case of Lavan’s
blessing to his progeny (f), we are not apprised of what was actually said,
perhaps because it is highly likely that in his blessing he invoked the alien
gods which he worshipped, as evidenced by Beraishit 31:19. As far as Noach’s
(a), and some of Yaakov’s (h) blessings are concerned, they are extremely
specific to particular individuals and therefore inappropriate for future
parents to use for their children down through the generations. Lavan’s blessing to his sister (b) is
standard fare at weddings (The RCA Lifecycle Madrich, pp. 86-7); however these
words appear to be overly gender specific, focused exclusively upon
reproduction, as well as quite belligerent.[9]
Yitzchak’s first blessing to Yaakov (c) as well as his words to Eisav (d) entail
dominance by one sibling over another for which there is ample textual evidence
that such expressed sentiments can lead to deep resentments and even the threat
of fratricide (see Beraishit 27:41)! The blessing that Yitzchak gives Yaakov
before he leaves for Charan (e) is the special blessing that was given to
Yitzchak as opposed to Yishmael, and Yaakov rather than Eisav, i.e., a blessing
of chosenness, with the implication that whoever does not receive it is
consigned to a lesser spiritual status, again rendering such a blessing
inappropriate in the overwhelming majority of cases. Subsequent parents would
most likely be interested in a formulation that could apply to all of their
children equally. The only remaining possibility is the blessing that Yaakov
gives to Yosef via his grandchildren, Ephraim and Menashe (g). While like in the
case of (b), this blessing has also found itself into ongoing Jewish practice as
part of the Friday night benediction given to one’s sons (ArtScroll Siddur, pp.
354-5), this is also its similar drawback, i.e., it has relevance only to boys
just as Lavan’s words are unique not only to girls in general, but specifically
when they prepare to marry. Consequently, by the process of elimination, if
preference is to be given to invoking a Biblical blessing when wishing to
articulate spiritual hopes for one’s children, “Birchat Kohanim” remains the
only completely legitimate possibility.
Nedarim 35b presents an intriguing
conceptualization of the role played by Priests that might lend itself to
explaining why “Birchat Kohanim” is uniquely appropriate for non-Kohen parents
and teachers to pronounce upon their children and disciples, despite Ketubot
24b. The Talmud poses the following question: “These Priests, ‘Sheluchai DiLan’
(are they our surrogates/representatives) or are they ‘Sheluchai D’Shmaya’ (the
surrogates/representatives of Heaven)?” This question’s formulation reflects the
assumption that Priests existentially occupy a unique dualistic position within
the human hierarchy.[10]
On the one hand, the Priests assist everyone else to properly engage in worship
of the Divine; but they are also extensions of God, and both receive on His
Behalf sacrifices as well as conduct His Holy Service. Consequently, who could
be more appropriate to beseech the One Who Appoints them to care for and protect
the people they are charged to represent?
From such a vantage point, parents
and teachers could be understood as paralleling the Priests in terms of serving
and representing “two masters” simultaneously, i.e., they are bound to care for
and educate their offspring and disciples, even as the Tora Commands that they
are to be viewed by their charges as entitled to respect comparable to that of
God Himself. The placement of the obligation to respect parents in the Ten
Commandments at the end of the laws governing relationships between man and God
which is simultaneously the beginning of the dictums governing how human beings
are expected to interact with one another (Shemot 20:12; Devarim 5:16) reflects
the “Priesthood” of parents, just as R. Elazar ben Shamua’s dictum in Ethics of
the Fathers 4:12, “…And the fear of your teacher should be comparable to the
Fear of Heaven” is an indicator of the “priesthood” of Tora teachers.
Consequently, just as parents and teachers can be understood to serve as
unofficial “Priests” within the galaxy of Jewish interpersonal relationships,
perhaps they more than others are entitled to bless those dependent upon them
who at the same time look up to them as God’s Surrogates, with the Priestly
Blessing.
May we all merit having the
blessings of Divine Favor and Peace realized in the lives of our families,
communities, and people. Shabbat
Shalom.
[1] These verses have also been
incorporated into the informal Jewish liturgy by including them in the material
recited/studied immediately following the recital of “Birchot HaTora” each
morning (ArtScroll Siddur, pp. 16-7) as well as the prayers uttered before
retiring for the evening (Ibid., 294-5). However, it would appear from the
Tora’s introductory verse to “Birchat Kohanim”—BaMidbar 6:23—that the
blessing was meant to be recited by
one person to another, as opposed to pronouncing them only for
oneself.
[2] “Birchat Kohanim” is one of a
series of religious practices that come under the rubric of “Zecher LeMikdash”
(in remembrance of the
[3] For an exploration of the
possibility that Aharon originally composed “Birkat Kohanim” see www.kmsynagogue.org/Shmini2.html
[4] RaShI, d.h. “D’Issur Aseh”: “Koh
Tevarchu”—you and not non-Kohanim. A prohibition that arises from the converse
of a positive Commandment is an (“Issur”) “Aseh” (lit., a positive prohibition,
i.e., the oxymoronic prohibition couched in positive, pro-active
terminology).
[5] E.g., a Levi, a Yisrael, a convert,
etc.
[6] Parents might be attracted to seek
out a Biblical blessing rather than a later Rabbinic one because of a sense that
the Bible’s words may be a more direct means for invoking God’s Concern and
Intervention than by resorting to words that He did not Formulate. Such a line
of reasoning would seem to underlie the utilization of the 13 Divine Attributes
(Shemot 34:6-7) in the “Selichot” services of the “Yomim Noraim”. See RaShI on
Shemot 33:19 for a Rabbinic source that claims that this particular Divine
Revelation was intended to teach Moshe how to in turn teach the rest of the
Jewish people how to beseech God’s Mercy in times of
need.
[7] Aside from those given by parents
to children, additional blessings are also found in Beraishit:
a) from God to man—Beraishit 1:28;
5:2; 9:1; 12:2-3; 17:16, 20; 22:17-8; 25:11; 26:3-4, 12, 24; 35:9; 47:7, 10;
48:3;
b) from angel to man—32:27-30;
and c) from man to man (peers, as
opposed to parents to children)—
However, it is clear that the most
relevant possibilities for language to be used by parents when blessing children
is derived from blessings originally given within a similar context.
[8] Although some of Yaakov’s comments
to his sons are clearly blessings, e.g., 49:8-27, particularly his words to
Yosef in 25-6, there are others that hardly appear to be such, e.g., 49:3-7.
Must we assume that 49:28 wherein all of Yaakov’s statements are categorized as
blessings to his sons, applies to most of Yaakov’s comments, but not all?
Or can direct and pointed criticism regarding some aspect of one’s behavior also
be a blessing, if not in the short-run, than at least down the
road?
[9] The RCA Madrich omits the end of
the verse “VeYirash Zaraich Et Sha’ar Sonav” in the actual blessing that the
father of the bride pronounces upon her at the “Bedecken” ceremony.
Consequently, only “Achotainu At Hayii LeAlfai Revava” is recited.
[10] Biblical commentators have noted
that man in general occupies such a dual role vis-à-vis the rest of
Creation:
RaMBaN on Beraishit
1:26
…In the case of man He Said, “Let
us make”, that is I and the aforementioned earth, let us make man, the earth to
bring forth the body from its elements as it did with the cattle and beasts…and
He, Blessed Be He, to Give the spirit from His Mouth, the Supreme One…In the
capacity of the body he will be similar to the earth from which he was taken,
and in spirit he will be similar to higher beings, because the spirit is not a
body and will not die…The explanation of this verse I have found ascribed to R.
Yoseph Kimchi (grandfather for RaDaK)…
Sephorno on Beraishit
1:26
“In Our Likeness”—With regard to
actions, he will be somewhat similar to the Heavenly Hosts in terms of their
ability to act consciously and causally. However, their actions are not the
result of free choice, and in this regard Man is not similar to them. In terms
of this quality Man is more like God concerning his being able to make free
choices. However, God’s Choices are always for good, which is not the case with
respect to Man’s choices...